|

These
pages are derived from a Communications Theory seminar in which students
discussed elements of popular/media culture which are (or have been) personally
meaningful to them. The themes shown on the primary page (above) are those
which seemed to make up the 'core' of the reasons why people might identify with
or relate to particular media figures.

|
|
A
redefined sense of 'family'
Contemporary
life has led some of us to feel a need for a radical reconceptualisation of ‘family’...
Relationships, we come to learn, come and go, and so we may feel a need to fix
other roots. Even the popularity of the sitcom Friends may reflect this:
the attraction of having an ‘alternative family’ made up of friends.
On
the one hand we take some media icons to our hearts and make them part of our
own imagined family (we found); but perhaps more significant – more ‘real’ – is
the meaningfulness of media icons who themselves have no conventional ‘family’.
Pet Shop Boys have each other, and a network of other friends, replacing the heterosexual
family unit. Madonna, more uniquely, for a long time had herself as the
only constant, and the fact that she made this work was seen as empowering.
Madonna
having a baby, which had initially seemed bizarre – fathered by her personal trainer
and all that – had actually turned out to be rather moving, with Madonna finally
finding some sense of place, one true focus of love in her daughter; and Madonna’s
words in Little Star (on Ray of Light, 1998) turned what some had
viewed rather cynically – baby as fashion accessory, and those other ideas which
don’t actually make sense – into something rather revelatory (“God gave a present
to me, made of flesh and bones... You are a treasure to me, you are my star: you
breathe new life into my broken heart...”). We are happy that Madonna has found
some stability within her world. We have grown up with her; her sadness reflects
ours; her happiness is our happiness!.
Return to primary page.
|